[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid0nu7vku3r2QrqXjyxgY29tSPmgAJbqTPa9a48j3ZqpSkRJhyadj3HcL9sHfHnBTokl":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":18},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":16,"creationDate":17},"pfbid0nu7vku3r2QrqXjyxgY29tSPmgAJbqTPa9a48j3ZqpSkRJhyadj3HcL9sHfHnBTokl","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid0nu7vku3r2QrqXjyxgY29tSPmgAJbqTPa9a48j3ZqpSkRJhyadj3HcL9sHfHnBTokl","陳宥丞","今晚與律師團隊完成法律諮詢、市政陳情，回顧一天 #賴皮違建 #柯文哲停車場 和 #台北市路權 等爭議，有很深的體悟，「民主法治」是不可退讓的底線和價值！\n\n先談談「把街頭還給人民」，不論是馬英九或是蔡英文；不管是國民黨或民進黨，都曾經把這句口號，拿來當作對外宣示和推崇的價值，但是現在卻發生了民眾黨粉絲借了1\u002F13投票當日北平東路的路權，想要辦兒童園遊會，卻被以賴清德競選總部在同地點，擔心發生衝突為理由，而駁回了有優先權民眾的集會申請。這到底是新工處和警察局揣摩上意，還是 蔣萬安市府逕自剝奪了民主國家民眾集會遊行的權利？沒人知道！\n\n既然路權是以申請時間的先後作為優先順序，台北市政府警察局就不能以自己的喜好或是猜想民眾立場不同就會有衝突，而予以逕自駁回，其實可以考慮改用抽籤的方式來做公平的競爭，讓大家心服口服；或是乾脆市府做個通案的規定，未來各候選人競選總部前的路權，在選舉期間都只有該候選人可以申請，讓大家有明確的法治化規定可遵循，而不是感覺有種藍綠一起針對民眾黨來夾殺的氛圍。\n\n再看看 賴清德 違建 和 柯文哲 停車場爭議，同樣攤在陽光下的證據，接受放大鏡的質疑，都應遵守台灣既有的法律和規定。柯文哲選擇面對問題、解決問題，並承諾絕對不會賴皮，該怎麼處理就怎麼處理！然而賴清德的特權違建迄今還在拖延，副總統帶頭視法律規定如無物，完全踐踏人民對民主法治的信任基礎！\n\n我今天當面詢問蔣萬安市長，民進黨現在掌控了黨政軍和第四權，難道國民黨的北市府還要限制人民的路權嗎? 台北市政府必須給市民一個清楚明白的交代；同時我也要問民進黨，明確新建且沒有繳稅、申報的違建，賴總統候選人是否勇敢面對，不要躲在賴皮寮後流著鱷魚的眼淚！\n\n「民主法治」是不能退讓的底線和價值！","","facebook",[11,12,13,14,15],"政府監督","公民權利","都市計畫","政治文化","司法改革",1702995947000,"2023-12-19T14:25:47.000Z",{"tags":19,"all":75},[20,22,24,26,29,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":11,"count":21},1063,{"name":14,"count":23},921,{"name":12,"count":25},788,{"name":27,"count":28},"公共衛生",444,{"name":13,"count":30},435,{"name":32,"count":33},"交通安全",304,{"name":15,"count":35},284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[20,22,24,26,29,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]