[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid0hi8ukLzySYn3ywYqCX2o8RuTVy88hctaEnQMnMcSi5TtdVyTiJPYrVDtrEYC9vi1l":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":16},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":14,"creationDate":15},"pfbid0hi8ukLzySYn3ywYqCX2o8RuTVy88hctaEnQMnMcSi5TtdVyTiJPYrVDtrEYC9vi1l","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid0hi8ukLzySYn3ywYqCX2o8RuTVy88hctaEnQMnMcSi5TtdVyTiJPYrVDtrEYC9vi1l","陳宥丞","對受害者的冷漠，比被詐騙更痛！\n今天很難過 #內湖傳出母女遭受詐騙，卻因受理報案過程 #警員言詞不當導致輕生案，實在讓人難受跟憤怒！\n\n詐騙在台灣一直以來令人深惡痛絕，百姓無處可逃，據打詐儀表板資料，今年9月全台受理詐騙案數為661件，財損數為4億1513萬元。百姓對政府打詐不力已非常無奈，善良百姓成為債騙集團的俎上之肉，從投資、網拍買賣到演唱回門票，無所不騙。我親自服務過的詐騙案，被害人有些恐慌症看心理醫生，有人全家被迫賣房成為低收入戶，還有被地下錢莊討債到失去工作，也有不小心走上絕路的案例。\n\n警方理應是人民保母，也在第一線最清楚百姓的痛苦，原應發揮同理心盡力幫助百姓，這名員警卻讓已站在人生十字路口的母女二人走上絕路，不論是否真有媒體報導之離譜行徑，內湖分局與我們辦公室的回應及對外新聞稿都明確看出，該員警確實有通話過程言詞不當缺乏同理心等情況。\n\n宥丞針對 #今日案件具體要求 : \n1.全力協助家屬辦理後事，並協助社會資源導入。\n2.涉案員警應調離現職並依法接受調查。\n3.一週內湖分局提供調查報告。\n4.有關母女報案之錄音檔、現場報案之派出所監視器，交由第三單位保留並公正調查。\n5.重新檢討受理報案流程，精進作為及加強抽查。\n6.協助員警心理衛生及情緒勞動照護。\n\n員警對受害者的冷漠，可能遠比被詐騙更痛，市府對警局受理報案sop，應該痛定思痛、亡羊補牢，當然，我相信大多數的台北市員警仍非常認真且努力，#港湖宥丞不應被汙名化或打擊基層士氣，我們也應該更積極要求基層警察的電話中應對的訓練，讓遇到困難的民眾都能有基本的尊重與重視，而非冷漠與傷害。\n\n#內湖 #南港 #陳宥丞\n#港湖宥丞 #服務有誠\n#服務電話☎️27936656\n自殺防治諮詢安心專線：1925\n生命線協談專線：1995\n@topfans","","facebook",[11,12,13],"政府監督","司法改革","公民權利",1733737896000,"2024-12-09T09:51:36.000Z",{"tags":17,"all":75},[18,20,23,25,28,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":11,"count":19},1063,{"name":21,"count":22},"政治文化",921,{"name":13,"count":24},788,{"name":26,"count":27},"公共衛生",444,{"name":29,"count":30},"都市計畫",435,{"name":32,"count":33},"交通安全",304,{"name":12,"count":35},284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[18,20,23,25,28,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]