[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid0DLW8DWDbwiqrkE3aMJZf8DRfzMmJm3PWpZVb5YRQ5QSeezQ3Q2a3TDY7Ptw71yZml":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":17},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"creationTimestamp":7,"description":8,"creationDate":9,"type":10,"tags":11},"pfbid0DLW8DWDbwiqrkE3aMJZf8DRfzMmJm3PWpZVb5YRQ5QSeezQ3Q2a3TDY7Ptw71yZml","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid0DLW8DWDbwiqrkE3aMJZf8DRfzMmJm3PWpZVb5YRQ5QSeezQ3Q2a3TDY7Ptw71yZml","陳宥丞",1771921187000,"#打破拖吊流氓犯罪產業鏈 🚨\n宥丞 要求受理報案 & #刑大專案處置！⚠️\n\n昨天揭露道路救援詐騙後，服務團隊收到大量的民眾私訊陳情，顯然這不是單一消費糾紛的個案，且經比對，極可能是不肖業者大量利用民眾拋錨恐慌，借機勒索的計劃性犯罪產業鏈。\n\n不肖業者有系統性的犯罪邏輯\n📌偽裝身份\n陳情資料中，有業者採取「#車身字樣與掛牌不符」的手段，刻意提高民眾後續追償的搜尋成本，讓警察在追蹤時產生斷點。\n\n📌強制性契約\n業者於緊急情況時，將定型化契約傳在Line記事本，當民眾急於取車時，強迫簽署「#封口條款」且將高額拖吊費藏匿於文字中，並要求市民承諾不得追責或向媒體申訴。\n\n📌法律漏洞\n更有民眾反映，在遭遇天價勒索後前往派出所報案，卻因不肖業者鑽研法律漏洞，將強迫簽署的契約包裝成商業行為，導致第一線員警常以民事糾紛為由建議民眾循消保官途徑。\n\n經過我們與警方確認，因反覆且非單一偶然糾紛，經過內部調查，應將此類「以扣車為手段、強迫簽署不對等協議」之社會案件，已涉嫌觸犯刑法第 304 條強制罪、詐欺罪、恐嚇取財及社維法。\n\n台北市政府 👮警察局承諾：\n✅曾遭遇拖吊天價勒索的民眾，只要案發地為台北市，派出所皆可以受理「#補報案」。\n✅此類涉及「高額收費、扣車勒索」之案件，警察局刑事警察大隊立刻成立 #專案處理。\n\n如果您或身邊友人曾有 #高額拖吊費爭議 案件，遭遇「點擊 Google 廣告後被天價收費」、「被威脅扣車或強迫簽署不合理結案協議」或「救援車輛與登記資料不符」等狀況，請立即向我們提供資料。\n\n您的截圖與單據，都能幫助我們進行後續的專案稽查，修補執法漏洞、徹底瓦解拖吊流氓產業鏈的關鍵證據。\n我們絕不容許非法業者利用民眾恐慌勒索取財，在台北街頭恣意橫行！\n\n@頭號粉絲\n陳宥丞議員\n#內湖 #南港 陳宥丞\n港湖宥丞\n市政有丞\n#服務電話☎️ 2793-6656","2026-02-24T08:19:47.000Z","facebook",[12,13,14,15,16],"交通安全","政府監督","司法改革","公民權利","刑事犯罪",{"tags":18,"all":75},[19,21,24,26,29,32,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":13,"count":20},1063,{"name":22,"count":23},"政治文化",921,{"name":15,"count":25},788,{"name":27,"count":28},"公共衛生",444,{"name":30,"count":31},"都市計畫",435,{"name":12,"count":33},304,{"name":14,"count":35},284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[19,21,24,26,29,32,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,96,98],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":16,"count":84},{"name":97,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":99,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]