[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid02xSZ2Q3YKn1XKBF2aQHSw44WcqP342BQpyFtdXJg6bxDjnNoyDkGpyXyBdZEcg8GSl":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":11},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"creationTimestamp":7,"description":8,"creationDate":9,"type":10},"pfbid02xSZ2Q3YKn1XKBF2aQHSw44WcqP342BQpyFtdXJg6bxDjnNoyDkGpyXyBdZEcg8GSl","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid02xSZ2Q3YKn1XKBF2aQHSw44WcqP342BQpyFtdXJg6bxDjnNoyDkGpyXyBdZEcg8GSl","陳宥丞",1773911785000,"#彩色指引線標線更新\n採納建議，回歸初衷設計\n\n去年 11 月我們引進日韓經驗，在質詢中建議市府內湖港墘路與提頂大道路口試辦彩色指引線，因為據國外統計，這項設計能有效降低 90% 的車禍肇事率，也減少車輛交纎堵塞。\n\n然而，今年1月交工處第一波施工後的成果卻讓大家傻眼，因為標線不連貫、指引不明確、牌面資訊混雜，甚至被民眾批評是畫蛇添足。\n\n在我們多次與交通局、交工處溝通與會勘後，今天交工處針對堤頂大道與港墘路口完成第二波優化，讓彩色導引回歸原先的設計初衷。\n\n1️⃣牌面更新：藍色導引向堤頂大道（平面）、橘色導引向國道一號南下匝道，用更清楚的標誌圖示與色塊圖像化資訊，協助用路人判斷並提前選定車道。\n\n2️⃣決策點前移：將彩色導引的起點從原加油站位置，提前延伸至瑞光路；透過這段 200 至 300 公尺 的導引緩衝，讓用路人能提前選定車道，有效減少切換車道的風險。\n\n3️⃣標線實線化：將彩色引導標線改為實線化，提供更明確的視覺軌跡，讓駕駛能安心地跟隨顏色行駛，有效減少左右飄移。\n\n4️⃣標牌與執法資訊分離： 重新調整牌面配置，將彩色導引資訊與科技執法標示拉開距離，讓指引牌面更加簡明易懂，消除民眾對受罰的疑慮。\n\n也提醒大家，彩色導引線屬於導引措施非強制性規範，在遵守交通規則前提下，大家還是可以依需求變換車道。\n\n設計應以人為本，我們引入國外創新設計的初衷是為了提升安全，從傳統標線邁向科學化設計的過程難免有適應期，所以市府在推動新式導引時，應站在駕駛者的第一視角思考，唯有讓設計貼近真實的路感與習慣，才能真正回應市民對安全交通的期待。\n\n陳宥丞議員\n#內湖 #南港 陳宥丞\n港湖宥丞\n市政有丞\n#服務電話☎️ 2793-6656\n每週二法律諮詢","2026-03-19T09:16:25.000Z","facebook",{"tags":12,"all":73},[13,16,19,22,25,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70],{"name":14,"count":15},"政府監督",1063,{"name":17,"count":18},"政治文化",921,{"name":20,"count":21},"公民權利",788,{"name":23,"count":24},"公共衛生",444,{"name":26,"count":27},"都市計畫",435,{"name":29,"count":30},"交通安全",304,{"name":32,"count":33},"司法改革",284,{"name":35,"count":36},"地方經濟",276,{"name":38,"count":39},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":41,"count":42},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":44,"count":45},"防災應變",191,{"name":47,"count":48},"環境保護",187,{"name":50,"count":51},"青年發展",181,{"name":53,"count":54},"教育與托育",147,{"name":56,"count":57},"勞工權益",139,{"name":59,"count":60},"居住正義",133,{"name":62,"count":63},"產業發展",112,{"name":65,"count":66},"長照政策",80,{"name":68,"count":69},"能源政策",64,{"name":71,"count":72},"動物保護",54,[13,16,19,22,25,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70,74,77,80,83,85,87,89,91,93,95,97],{"name":75,"count":76},"性別平等",39,{"name":78,"count":79},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":81,"count":82},"意志力",1,{"name":84,"count":82},"刑事警察",{"name":86,"count":82},"詐欺罪",{"name":88,"count":82},"強制罪",{"name":90,"count":82},"恐嚇取財",{"name":92,"count":82},"警察局",{"name":94,"count":82},"刑事犯罪",{"name":96,"count":82},"消費權益",{"name":98,"count":82},"拒絕勒索"]