[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid02gNNuipjH1VCg3gPTuSu4kQHD9FsbLVA1RSX9LFBRcpptuitcKDLyFQEEb3tyrod9l":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":19},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":17,"creationDate":18},"pfbid02gNNuipjH1VCg3gPTuSu4kQHD9FsbLVA1RSX9LFBRcpptuitcKDLyFQEEb3tyrod9l","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid02gNNuipjH1VCg3gPTuSu4kQHD9FsbLVA1RSX9LFBRcpptuitcKDLyFQEEb3tyrod9l","陳宥丞","兒虐案，蔣萬安市長不給資料！\n害怕面對還是幫誰扛鍋？ \n\n面對令人髮指的兒虐案件一再發生，足以證明社會安全網亟需縫補漏洞來挽救，但事發至今已近3個月，從中央、地方政府到社福團體都責無旁貸，必須共同找出原因、彌補憾事及修改制度，不再讓民眾期待落空。\n\n但無奈從中央開始，行政機關衛福部專案報告僅僅草率2頁，遭到批評後才緊急增加成5頁，原應發揮角色的立法院卻成為藍綠秀場亂成一團，雙北首長從事發之後的態度遠遠不如私立學校校車翻覆事件的積極。蔣市長事後發文甚至用公親變事主的說法，彷彿所有事件與自己無關，試圖解釋自己一開始的不作為，不是故意的，但其實也只是恰恰證明自己從政一路以來不沾鍋的消極心態。\n\n上週我們辦公室發出書面質詢，要求北市府應亡羊補牢，從居家托育服務社工訪視制度、保母評鑑功能到兒虐會議處置失當等要求市府改善，同時 黃國昌總召也與我們共同調閱社會局與衛福部往來公文紀錄及內容，不料苦等四天，只回覆系統登載和電話通聯，並無任何與衛福部正式往來的公文！\n\n若屬實，代表社會局面對涉及人命的虐童案，所做的也僅於系統作業而已，並未採取其他公開措施或積極行為，甚至沒有取得任何衛福部的公文回覆來證明自己有所作為，抑或蔣市府不敢公開行政資料(與司法調查不公開無關)，是否害怕本案揭露更多細節，會讓政治風暴延燒，就選擇規避行政調查，還是擔心會波及有力人士或其他團體單位？\n\n蔣市長上任一年，從天坑，深坑大火到保母虐童，總是漫不經心慢郎中，加上近日北市監視器發生司法爭議事件，我認為蔣市府除就虐童致死案至 #議會專案報告，徹查現有托育情形？有無漏網之魚？共同提出與中央、社福團體合作的改善方案之外；另外捲入司法疑雲之監視器案，也應列入專案報告，將預算編列及協商歷程詳盡和市民朋友釋疑報告，並調查府內員工是否涉及與廠商不正當之利益關係，主動檢討市府的決策是否有浪費頻寬，導致圖利廠商、浪費稅金之可能。","","facebook",[11,12,13,14,15,16],"政府監督","教育與托育","公共衛生","司法改革","政治文化","公民權利",1710832035000,"2024-03-19T07:07:15.000Z",{"tags":20,"all":75},[21,23,25,27,29,32,35,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":11,"count":22},1063,{"name":15,"count":24},921,{"name":16,"count":26},788,{"name":13,"count":28},444,{"name":30,"count":31},"都市計畫",435,{"name":33,"count":34},"交通安全",304,{"name":14,"count":36},284,{"name":38,"count":39},"地方經濟",276,{"name":41,"count":42},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":44,"count":45},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":47,"count":48},"防災應變",191,{"name":50,"count":51},"環境保護",187,{"name":53,"count":54},"青年發展",181,{"name":12,"count":56},147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[21,23,25,27,29,32,35,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]