[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-eW1gv6f4L_E":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":15},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"creationTimestamp":7,"description":8,"creationDate":9,"title":10,"type":11,"tags":12},"eW1gv6f4L_E","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.youtube.com\u002Fwatch?v=eW1gv6f4L_E","陳宥丞",1789476636000,"每天尖峰時刻走進捷運車廂，許多市民朋友都發現空間變了。中央立柱被移除，座椅也被拆除，取而代之的是大片看似開闊的走道。\n\n市府的初衷立意良善，希望透過淨空車廂來提升載客容量與容納嬰兒車。然而當列車高速行駛與煞車時，中間區域卻成了一片缺乏無抓握支撐的危險場域。\n\n此外，高度過高的吊環設計，讓身材較嬌小的女性、長輩或孩童根本難以觸及，整趟通勤過程宛如是平衡感大考驗。\n\n這就是典型的眼鏡蛇效應，原先設定了解決問題的方案，卻因為忽略了真實的人性反應，反而誘發出與本意背道而馳的負面結果；用容積數學題來規劃政策，卻忽略了通勤者在物理安全上的行為心理學。\n\n尤其當車廂中央失去穩固的垂直支撐，乘客基於避險本能，自然會選擇卡在車門兩側或靠窗區域，寧可擠在門口也不願往內移動。這種心理防衛機制直接導致了車門口嚴重堵塞、車廂中央空無一人的現象，整體疏運效率不增反減，更壓縮了老弱婦孺的基本搭乘權益。\n\n我在質詢中向市長提出建議，國際各大都會區在調整車廂時，東京地鐵堅持不犧牲抓握安全的防跌設計，新加坡地鐵則採用兼顧分流與抓握的三叉立柱。臺北市的捷運系統應該借鏡成熟經驗，主動增設多階低位吊環、橫向天花板扶手與多向支撐桿，在擴充空間的同時，把應有的安全感還給每位通勤族。\n\n陳宥丞議員\n#內湖 #南港\n#陳宥丞\n#有丞擔\n服務電話☎️ 2793-6656","2026-09-15T12:50:36.000Z","捷運立柱、把手變不見？市長同意立刻解決！","youtube_video",[13,14],"交通安全","政府監督",{"tags":16,"all":75},[17,19,22,25,28,31,33,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":14,"count":18},1129,{"name":20,"count":21},"政治文化",951,{"name":23,"count":24},"公民權利",770,{"name":26,"count":27},"公共衛生",472,{"name":29,"count":30},"都市計畫",444,{"name":13,"count":32},326,{"name":34,"count":35},"司法改革",300,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",286,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",265,{"name":43,"count":44},"防災應變",218,{"name":46,"count":47},"體育運動發展",211,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",202,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",179,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",167,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",141,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",110,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",87,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",65,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",56,[17,19,22,25,28,31,33,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104,106],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",40,{"name":80,"count":81},"公共安全",5,{"name":83,"count":84},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":86,"count":87},"社會監督",1,{"name":89,"count":87},"意志力",{"name":91,"count":87},"刑事警察",{"name":93,"count":87},"詐欺罪",{"name":95,"count":87},"強制罪",{"name":97,"count":87},"恐嚇取財",{"name":99,"count":87},"警察局",{"name":101,"count":87},"刑事犯罪",{"name":103,"count":87},"消費權益",{"name":105,"count":87},"拒絕勒索",{"name":107,"count":87},"地方政府"]