[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-96jem9_2l4c":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":16},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"creationTimestamp":7,"description":8,"creationDate":9,"title":10,"type":11,"tags":12},"96jem9_2l4c","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.youtube.com\u002Fwatch?v=96jem9_2l4c","陳宥丞",1787842134000,"今天我議會跨黨派同仁參與工務委員會市政考察，實地檢視信義路五段的「綠籬式吸菸區」以及西門町商圈的「負壓式吸菸室」。\n\n我是議會第一位倡議台北邁向無菸城市的議員，不只我，跨黨派議員都樂見政策落實。然而如今看到市府的施政現況，實在令人憂心。\n\n各局處缺乏整合、各自為政，像放完暑假在趕作業一樣匆促交差。以公館柵欄式吸菸區為例，不僅在網路上被罵爆，讓吸菸者不願意進去吸菸，既沒有解決二手菸問題，反而製造出更多公共安全與城市治理的新死角。\n\n實地考察中還發現，綠籬式吸菸區的熄菸裝置邊角極度尖銳，高度剛好在孩童的頭部與視線範圍，隨時有撞擊受傷的風險；現場甚至連基本防雨與排水機制都未完善，下雨即積水。\n\n反觀西門町負壓吸菸室的熄菸盒有圓滑收邊，兩相對比，顯見市府連最基本的設計標準都沒有統一。\n\n此外，負壓吸菸室也缺乏雙層動線與空氣阻隔，我今天具體建議應比照國際吸菸室規劃，進出必須設置「雙道緩衝門」，才能有效防止菸味在開門瞬間外溢，避免民眾聚集在出入口直接抽菸。\n\n再著，吸菸室還欠缺跨局處聯防與維管機制，以西門町吸菸室為例，內部若缺乏定時廣播宣導與警政、社福單位的連線管理，極易在夜間淪為特定族群長久停留或吹冷氣的空間，讓一般市民不敢靠近，更形成嚴重的治安與公安死角。\n\n無菸城市是進步城市的價值展現，但進步需要科學化的管理與紮實的工程設計支撐。當權責不清、設施不明，受害的永遠是全體市民。\n\n我再次呼籲蔣市府，應整合工務、衛生、環保、警察與社會局，重新訂定吸菸防護設施的統一標準。無菸城市要做，就要紮實、一步一腳印的把吸菸室真正做好。\n\n陳宥丞議員\n#內湖 #南港\n#陳宥丞\n#有丞擔\n服務電話☎️ 2793-6656","2026-08-27T14:48:54.000Z","無菸城市要落實，吸菸室要做就要做好！","youtube_video",[13,14,15],"政府監督","公共衛生","環境保護",{"tags":17,"all":75},[18,20,23,26,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":13,"count":19},1129,{"name":21,"count":22},"政治文化",951,{"name":24,"count":25},"公民權利",770,{"name":14,"count":27},472,{"name":29,"count":30},"都市計畫",444,{"name":32,"count":33},"交通安全",326,{"name":35,"count":36},"司法改革",300,{"name":38,"count":39},"地方經濟",286,{"name":41,"count":42},"重大公共工程",265,{"name":44,"count":45},"防災應變",218,{"name":47,"count":48},"體育運動發展",211,{"name":15,"count":50},202,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",179,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",167,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",141,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",110,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",87,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",65,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",56,[18,20,23,26,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104,106],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",40,{"name":80,"count":81},"公共安全",5,{"name":83,"count":84},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":86,"count":87},"社會監督",1,{"name":89,"count":87},"意志力",{"name":91,"count":87},"刑事警察",{"name":93,"count":87},"詐欺罪",{"name":95,"count":87},"強制罪",{"name":97,"count":87},"恐嚇取財",{"name":99,"count":87},"警察局",{"name":101,"count":87},"刑事犯罪",{"name":103,"count":87},"消費權益",{"name":105,"count":87},"拒絕勒索",{"name":107,"count":87},"地方政府"]