[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-1437633798110560":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":16},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"creationTimestamp":7,"description":8,"creationDate":9,"type":10,"tags":11},"1437633798110560","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002Freel\u002F1437633798110560\u002F","陳宥丞",1773236090000,"#獨居老人受困6小時奄奄一息 \n#社會局竟不克出席檢討會？\n\n前陣子台北市一名列冊在案的獨居長輩，在自宅受困長達 6 小時，直到居服員進門才發現長輩已奄奄一息，必須緊急送醫。\n\n蔣萬安市長上任前曾射出長照三支箭說要陪長輩安心慢老，很顯然在家安老的社會安全網出現很大的危機。\n\n根據調查，社工早在當天早上10點第一時間就啟動警示機制Alarm\n然而社會局單位卻直到下午4點，才由居服員破門而入。這中間整整 6 小時的通報空窗期，讓原本應是救命的機制，差點錯失一位長輩送醫的黃金時間。\n\n事發後，居服機構希望邀請老服中心共同檢討機制，避免悲劇重演，然而老服中心竟回覆「因為有重要會議，不克參加。」\n\n我就請問，究竟是哪一場會議，比市民的生命安全更重要？\n\n目前外界也必須知道，這樣的回覆究竟是由哪一位主管做出的決定？是誰認為這場檢討機制可以缺席？\n\n更今天幸好長輩最後被送醫救回，但如果當時真的發生不幸，這件事情恐怕就不只是行政懲處的問題，而是可能需要檢察官介入調查的司法案件。\n\n針對此案，我已要求嚴正要求社會局提出具體改革的書面報告：\n 1. 檢討通報機制：重新定義 Alarm 觸發後的強制介入SOP，不能只是以電話回覆。\n 2. 強化跨單位檢討：任何涉及人身安全之重大個案研討，主管機關不得缺席，必須落實問責制。\n\n陳宥丞議員\n#內湖 #南港 陳宥丞\n港湖宥丞\n市政有丞\n#服務電話☎️ 2793-6656","2026-03-11T13:34:50.000Z","facebook",[12,13,14,15],"政府監督","長照政策","公民權利","司法改革",{"tags":17,"all":74},[18,20,23,25,28,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,68,71],{"name":12,"count":19},1063,{"name":21,"count":22},"政治文化",921,{"name":14,"count":24},788,{"name":26,"count":27},"公共衛生",444,{"name":29,"count":30},"都市計畫",435,{"name":32,"count":33},"交通安全",304,{"name":15,"count":35},284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":13,"count":67},80,{"name":69,"count":70},"能源政策",64,{"name":72,"count":73},"動物保護",54,[18,20,23,25,28,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,68,71,75,78,81,84,86,88,90,92,94,96,98],{"name":76,"count":77},"性別平等",39,{"name":79,"count":80},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":82,"count":83},"意志力",1,{"name":85,"count":83},"刑事警察",{"name":87,"count":83},"詐欺罪",{"name":89,"count":83},"強制罪",{"name":91,"count":83},"恐嚇取財",{"name":93,"count":83},"警察局",{"name":95,"count":83},"刑事犯罪",{"name":97,"count":83},"消費權益",{"name":99,"count":83},"拒絕勒索"]